UC Hastings College of the Law Library Logo
Catalog Website
New! search database of faculty citations

Faculty Publications

David L. Faigman

Books
Journal Articles
  • Defining Empirical Frames of Reference in Constitutional Cases: Unraveling the As–Applied Versus Facial Distinction in Constitutional Law, 36 Hastings Const. L.Q. 631 (2009). LX HEIN WL
  • Evidence Code Section 802: The Neglected Key to Rationalizing the California Law of Expert Testimony, 42 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 427 (2009) (with Edward J. Imwinkelreid). LX HEIN WL SSRN
  • A Matter of Fit: The Law of Discrimination and the Science of Implicit Bias, 59 Hastings L.J. 1389 (2008) (with Nilanjana Dasgupta & Cecilia L. Ridgeway). LX HEIN WL
  • Admissibility Regimes: The "Opinion Rule" and Other Oddities and Exceptions to Scientific Evidence, the Scientific Revolution, and Common Sense, 36 S.U. L. Rev. 699 (2008).
  • Anecdotal Forensics, Phrenology, and Other Abject Lessons from the History of Science, 59 Hastings L.J. 979 (2008). LX HEIN WL
  • Failed Forensics: How Forensic Science Lost Its Way and How It Might Yet Find It, 4 Ann. Rev. L. Soc. Sci. 149 (2008). SSRN HOPAC
  • Scientific Realism in Constitutional Law, 73 Brook. L. Rev. 1067 (2008). LX HEIN WL
  • Brief of Constitutional Law Professors David L. Faigman and Ashutosh A. Bhagwat, et al., as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondents in Gonzales v. Carhart and Gonzales v. Planned Parenthood, Nos. 05-830, 05-1382 (Introduction and Published Brief to United States Supreme Court), 34 Hastings Const. L.Q. 69 (2006) (with Ashutosh Bhagwat & Kathryn M. Davis). LX HEIN WL SSRN
  • Judges as "Amateur Scientists", 86 B.U. L. Rev. 1207 (Dec. 2006). LX HEIN WL
  • Expert Evidence After Daubert, 1 Ann. Rev. L. Soc. Sci. 105 (2005) (with Michael J. Saks). HOPAC
  • Psychological Evidence at the Dawn of the Law's Scientific Age, 56 Ann. Rev. Psychol. 631 (2005) (with John Monahan). HOPAC
  • Expert Evidence in Flatland: The Geometry of a World Without Scientific Culture, 34 Seton Hall L. Rev. 255 (2003). LX HEIN WL
  • Making Moral Judgments Through Behavioural Science: The "Substantial Lack of Volitional Control" Requirement in Civil Commitments, 2 Law, Probability & Risk 309 (2003). HEIN WL SSRN
  • The Limits of the Polygraph, 20 Issues Sci. & Tech. 40 (2003) (with Stephen E. Fienberg & Paul C. Stern). HOPAC
  • Is Science Different for Lawyers?, 297 Sci. 339 (July 19, 2002). WL
  • Embracing the Darkness: Logerquist v. McVey and the Doctrine of Ignorance of Science is an Excuse, 33 Ariz. St. L.J. 87 (2001). LX HEIN WL
  • The Tipping Point in the Law's Use of Science: The Epidemic of Scientific Sophistication that Began with DNA Profiling and Toxic Torts, 67 Brook. L. Rev. 111 (2001). LX HEIN WL
  • How Good Is Good Enough? Expert Evidence under Daubert and Kumho, 50 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 645 (2000) (with David H. Kaye, Michael J. Saks, & Joseph Sanders). LX HEIN WL
  • The Law's Scientific Revolution: Reflections and Ruminations on the Law's Use of Experts in Year Seven of the Revolution, 57 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 661 (2000). LX HEIN WL
  • Looking for Policy in All the Wrong Places: A Comment on the Strategies of "the Race and Gender Crowd" Toward Evidence Law, 28 Sw. U. L. Rev. 289 (1999). HEIN WL
  • Truth, with a Small "t", 49 Hastings L.J. 1185 (1998). LX HEIN WL
  • Appellate Review of Scientific Evidence Under Daubert and Joiner, 48 Hastings L.J. 969 (1997). LX HEIN WL
  • The Battered Woman Syndrome in the Age of Science, 39 Ariz. L. Rev. 67 (1997) (with Amy J. Wright). LX HEIN WL
  • "And to the Republic for Which It Stands": Guaranteeing a Republican Form of Government, 23 Hastings Const. L.Q. 1057 (1996) (with Catherine A. Rogers). HEIN WL
  • Making the Law Safe for Science: A Proposed Rule for the Admission of Expert Testimony, 35 Washburn L.J. 401 (1996). LX HEIN WL
  • The Syndromic Lawyer Syndrome: A Psychological Theory of Evidentiary Munificence, 67 U. Colo. L. Rev. 817 (1996). LX HEIN WL
  • Mapping the Labyrinth of Scientific Evidence, 46 Hastings L.J. 555 (1995). LX HEIN WL
  • The Evidentiary Status of Social Science Under Daubert: Is it "Scientific," "Technical," or "Other" Knowledge?, 1 Psychol. Pub. Pol'y & L. 960 (1995). LX
  • Check Your Crystal Ball at the Courthouse Door, Please: Exploring the Past, Understanding the Present, and Worrying About the Future of Scientific Evidence, 15 Cardozo L. Rev. 1799 (1994) (with Elise Porter & Michael J. Saks). LX HEIN WL
  • Madisonian Balancing: A Theory of Constitutional Adjudication, 88 Nw. U. L. Rev. 641 (1994). LX HEIN WL
  • Measuring Constitutionality Transactionally, 45 Hastings L.J. 753 (1994). LX HEIN WL
  • Constitutional Adventures in Wonderland: Exploring the Debate Between Rules and Standards Through the Looking Glass of the First Amendment, 44 Hastings L.J. 829 (1993). LX HEIN WL
  • Reconciling Individual Rights and Government Interests: Madisonian Principles Versus Supreme Court Practice, 78 Va. L. Rev. 1521 (1992). LX HEIN WL
  • Struggling to Stop the Flood of Unreliable Expert Testimony, 76 Minn. L. Rev. 877 (1992). LX HEIN WL
  • "Normative Constitutional Fact-finding": Exploring the Empirical Component of Constitutional Interpretation, 139 U. Pa. L. Rev. 541 (1991). LX HEIN WL
  • By What Authority?: Reflections on the Constitutionality and Wisdom of the Flag Protection Act of 1989, 17 Hastings Const. L.Q. 353 (1990) (reprinted in The Constitution and the Flag, Vol. 2: The Flag Burning Cases 457 (Michael Kent Curtis ed., 1993)). HEIN HOPAC
  • Confronting the Tyranny of the Majority, 8 S.F. Barrister L.J. 3 (1989).
  • To Have and Have Not: Assessing the Value of Social Science to the Law as Science and Policy, 38 Emory L.J. 1005 (1989). LX HEIN WL
  • Bayes' Theorem in the Trial Process: Instructing Jurors on the Value of Statistical Evidence, 12 Law & Hum. Behav. 1 (1988) (with A.J. Baglioni, Jr.). HOPAC
  • The Battered Woman Syndrome and Self-defense: A Legal and Empirical Dissent, 72 Va. L. Rev. 619 (1986). LX HEIN WL
Chapters In Books
  • Expert Psychological Testimony, Forms of, in Encylopedia of Psychology & Law 275 (Brian L. Cutler ed., Sage Pub. 2008). HOPAC
  • Expert Psychological Testimony, in Encyclopedia of Psychology & Law 267 (Brian L. Cutler ed., Sage Pub. 2008). HOPAC
  • Expert Testimony, Qualifications of, in Encyclopedia of Psychology & Law 280 (Brian L. Cutler ed., Sage Pub. 2008). HOPAC
  • The Limits of Science in the Courtroom, in Beyond Common Sense: Psychological Science in the Courtroom 303 (Eugene Borgida & Susan T. Fiske eds., Blackwell Pub. 2008). HOPAC
  • Fact–Finding in Constitutional Cases, in How Law Knows 156 (Austin Sarat et al eds., Stanford Univ. Press 2007). HOPAC
  • A Flow Chart of the Federal Rules of Evidence, in Federal Rules of Evidence for United States Courts and Magistrates ___ (West Pub. Co. 1992 - 2003). HOPAC
  • Expert Evidence: The Rules and the Rationality the Law Applies (or Should Apply) to Psychological Expertise, in Handbook of Psychology in Legal Contexts 367 (David Carson & Ray Bull eds., J. Wiley 2003). HOPAC
  • Should Forensic Science be 'Scientific'?, in Police, Techniques Modernes D'enquete ou de Surveillance et Droit de la Preuve: Actes du Colloque ___ (Edition R.D.U.S. 1998).
  • Like Socrates, But Hold the Hemlock: Teaching Law, in Full Disclosure: Do You Really Want To Be A Lawyer? 95 (Susan J. Bell ed., Peterson's Guides 1992). HOPAC
Book Reviews
  • Discerning Justice When Battered Women Kill, 39 Hastings L.J. 207 (1987) (reviewing Charles Patrick Ewing, Battered Women Who Kill: Psychological Self–Defense as Legal Justification (1987)). LX HEIN WL
Dissertations & Theses
  • Setting the Odds on Justice: Statistics and Probabilities in the Trial Process (1984) (unpublished Masters Thesis, University of Virginia) (on file with Brown Library, University of Virginia).




Copyright © 2010 U.C. Hastings College of the Law. Redistribution or commercial use is prohibited without express written permission.